NFL DFS Projections
A projection is not a forecast of what will happen. It is a distribution, and treating it as a single number is the most common mistake in DFS.
Updated 2026-09-09 · rebuilt daily
Projected points per game
| # | Player | Team | G | FPPG | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Christian McCaffreyRB | SF | 17 | 24.5 | 417 |
| 2 | Puka NacuaWR | LAR | 16 | 23.5 | 376 |
| 3 | Josh AllenQB | BUF | 17 | 22.2 | 377 |
| 4 | Bijan RobinsonRB | ATL | 17 | 21.9 | 372 |
| 5 | Jahmyr GibbsRB | DET | 17 | 21.6 | 368 |
| 6 | Matthew StaffordQB | LAR | 17 | 21.4 | 363 |
| 7 | Drake MayeQB | NE | 17 | 21.3 | 362 |
| 8 | Jonathan TaylorRB | IND | 17 | 21.3 | 361 |
| 9 | Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR | SEA | 17 | 21.2 | 361 |
| 10 | Brock PurdyQB | SF | 9 | 21.0 | 189 |
| 11 | Patrick MahomesQB | KC | 14 | 20.9 | 293 |
| 12 | Trevor LawrenceQB | JAX | 17 | 20.8 | 353 |
| 13 | De'Von AchaneRB | MIA | 16 | 20.2 | 323 |
| 14 | Ja'Marr ChaseWR | CIN | 16 | 19.7 | 315 |
| 15 | Jalen HurtsQB | PHI | 16 | 19.4 | 311 |
| 16 | Caleb WilliamsQB | CHI | 17 | 19.2 | 326 |
| 17 | Amon-Ra St. BrownWR | DET | 17 | 19.1 | 324 |
| 18 | Dak PrescottQB | DAL | 17 | 18.9 | 321 |
| 19 | Justin HerbertQB | LAC | 16 | 18.8 | 301 |
| 20 | Trey McBrideTE | ARI | 17 | 18.6 | 316 |
| 21 | Jared GoffQB | DET | 17 | 18.4 | 313 |
| 22 | Daniel JonesQB | IND | 13 | 18.3 | 238 |
| 23 | Bo NixQB | DEN | 17 | 18.3 | 311 |
| 24 | James Cook IIIRB | BUF | 17 | 18.0 | 305 |
| 25 | Jaxson DartQB | NYG | 14 | 17.7 | 248 |
| 26 | Joe BurrowQB | CIN | 8 | 17.4 | 139 |
| 27 | Lamar JacksonQB | BAL | 13 | 17.4 | 226 |
| 28 | Jacoby BrissettQB | ARI | 14 | 17.2 | 241 |
| 29 | George PickensWR | DAL | 17 | 17.1 | 290 |
| 30 | Jayden DanielsQB | WSH | 7 | 16.9 | 118 |
| 31 | Chris OlaveWR | NO | 16 | 16.8 | 269 |
| 32 | Baker MayfieldQB | TB | 17 | 16.8 | 285 |
| 33 | Drake LondonWR | ATL | 12 | 16.7 | 201 |
| 34 | Derrick HenryRB | BAL | 17 | 16.6 | 283 |
| 35 | Chase BrownRB | CIN | 17 | 16.5 | 281 |
| 36 | Kyler MurrayQB | ARI | 5 | 16.4 | 82 |
| 37 | Jordan LoveQB | GB | 15 | 16.1 | 241 |
| 38 | Josh JacobsRB | GB | 15 | 15.9 | 239 |
| 39 | Davante AdamsWR | LAR | 14 | 15.9 | 223 |
| 40 | Cam SkatteboRB | NYG | 8 | 15.8 | 127 |
| 41 | Kyren WilliamsRB | LAR | 17 | 15.6 | 265 |
| 42 | C.J. StroudQB | HOU | 14 | 15.5 | 217 |
| 43 | Javonte WilliamsRB | DAL | 16 | 15.3 | 245 |
| 44 | Justin FieldsQB | NYJ | 9 | 15.3 | 138 |
| 45 | Sam DarnoldQB | SEA | 17 | 15.1 | 256 |
| 46 | Omarion HamptonRB | LAC | 9 | 15.1 | 136 |
| 47 | Nico CollinsWR | HOU | 15 | 15.0 | 225 |
| 48 | Tyler ShoughQB | NO | 11 | 15.0 | 165 |
| 49 | Travis Etienne Jr.RB | JAX | 17 | 14.9 | 254 |
| 50 | A.J. BrownWR | PHI | 15 | 14.7 | 220 |
| 51 | George KittleTE | SF | 11 | 14.7 | 162 |
| 52 | Carson WentzQB | MIN | 5 | 14.7 | 73 |
| 53 | Aaron RodgersQB | PIT | 16 | 14.6 | 234 |
| 54 | Bryce YoungQB | CAR | 16 | 14.6 | 233 |
| 55 | Brock BowersTE | LV | 12 | 14.5 | 174 |
| 56 | Zay FlowersWR | BAL | 17 | 14.5 | 246 |
| 57 | Ashton JeantyRB | LV | 17 | 14.5 | 246 |
| 58 | Saquon BarkleyRB | PHI | 16 | 14.5 | 231 |
| 59 | D'Andre SwiftRB | CHI | 16 | 14.4 | 231 |
| 60 | CeeDee LambWR | DAL | 14 | 14.3 | 201 |
How these numbers are calculated
Season totals from published play-by-play, scored with DraftKings classic full-PPR values (0.04/passing yard, 4/passing TD, −1/interception, 0.1/rushing and receiving yard, 6/rushing and receiving TD, 1/reception, −1/fumble lost) and divided by games played. Single-game yardage bonuses cannot be recovered from season totals and are excluded, so these figures run slightly below a true DraftKings average.
This is a baseline, not a forecast. It carries no adjustment for opponent, venue, injury or expected game script, and it weights a game in March exactly as heavily as one played yesterday. Use it as the starting point a matchup-aware read departs from, and treat any single figure as the centre of a wide range rather than a prediction.
A number hides the thing that matters
Two players can both project for 14 points and be completely different assets. One is a possession receiver who catches six passes for 60 yards nearly every week. The other is a deep threat who posts 3 points most weeks and 40 when the long ball connects.
In a cash game you want the first. In a large tournament you need the second, because finishing first requires an outcome in the tail — and the steady player has no tail.
Where projections come from
The honest ones are built from workload rather than results: targets, carries, snap share, red-zone usage. Volume is far more stable week to week than efficiency, so a model grounded in opportunity holds up better than one grounded in recent fantasy points.
The remaining inputs are matchup-level: opponent pace, expected game script, and whether the team is likely to be leading (and running) or trailing (and throwing).
Projections do not survive contact with ownership
Knowing a player will score well is only half the problem. If everyone knows, the payoff is split across thousands of identical lineups. The second half of the question — how many other people will arrive at the same answer — is where tournament results are actually decided.
Common questions
What is a good projection source?
Any source whose method is grounded in opportunity — targets, carries, snap counts — rather than a rolling average of past fantasy points.
NFL team pages
Get the daily slate in your inbox
One email before lock: the day's games, the lines that moved, and where the numbers disagree. Free while in beta.